Monthly Archives: October 2007

USB Flash Drive has wine bottle shape

wineusbdrive

Do you know anyone who is so into wine that their lives could be used as material for a Sideways sequel? Fortunately, there is a flash drive for them, and it looks like…a wine bottle. (What else?)

This wine bottle USB Flash Drive is more than just a 1GB storage device, but there is some pre-loaded software called Open Cellar. This program is designed for wine enthusiasts to keep track of their personal collection. Open Cellar also contains videos from wine taster Michel Rolland, as well as other wine-related fun such as screen saver, wall paper, and ring tones.

Source: www.gadgets-weblog.com

Cleavage Creek wine labels feature breast cancer survivors

ScreenShot001 A new line of wines saucily named Cleavage Creek and featuring models sporting discreet decolletage on the label has a surprising back story: the wines are part of fundraising campaign to fight breast cancer; the models are survivors of that disease.

“My goal was to honor their courage and inspire them,” said winery owner Budge Brown, who was moved to start the campaign after his wife of 48 years died of breast cancer.

Cleavage Creek wines, which cost from $18 to $50 a bottle, made their debut this month, with a first release of 2,000 cases. “It’s a win-win,” said the 75-year-old Brown. “You make a contribution. You get a beautiful bottle of wine.”

Among the models featured is Pattie Daly Caruso, the face of the cabernet sauvignon label as well as a reserve chardonnay. Caruso, a breast cancer survivor who is active in fundraising and awareness efforts, thinks the new campaign is a clever way to draw attention to the wine and the cause it supports.

“The truth is that this was just a natural,” she said, noting that Brown’s Napa Valley property has two hills with a creek running through, evocative of the name in a literal sense. “It’s just been wonderful because he is giving 10 percent of the money right off the top to breast cancer research, and that to me is incredible.”

At least some of the wine has been sold already. Caruso’s daughter Quinn, an ad agency executive in Santa Monica, and son Carson, host of NBC TV’s “Last Call with Carson Daly,” have already put in orders.

The issue of wine and cancer has been in the news lately, with a recent study finding that all types of alcohol, including wine, add to the risk of developing breast cancer in women. Caruso has seen those studies, but says “if we pick up a magazine or turn on TV there will be someone saying something about all the things that we drink except maybe water. I personally think that a couple of glasses of red wine are very good for you. I try to be very cautious and do the right thing, but red wine to me is, if not medicinal, pretty wonderful.”

Cleavage Creek joins a number of wineries raising money for causes that strike close to home.

At Lookout Ridge Winery in Sonoma County, founder Gordon Holmes, whose wife has MS, donates wheelchairs to the Blackhawk-based Wheelchair Foundation. The program, which began with a chair donated for every case of Holmes’ wine sold, has accelerated to a chair for every bottle, with several hundred donated so far, said spokesman Michael Coats.

Staglin Family Vineyard co-owners Shari and Garen Staglin, whose son has schizophrenia, are longtime fundraisers for research to fight that disease. They’ve raised more than $35 million through annual music festivals at their Napa Valley winery and donate a portion of proceeds from their Salus wines.

Brown is promising to donate 10 percent of gross sales of Cleavage Creek wines, meaning wine donated to charity as well as sold. One of his first donations was $5,000 to the Breast Care Center of Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa. The money will go toward buying a MRI machine with superior detection technology for evaluating the size and extent of breast cancer.

“We are absolutely thrilled,” said Lisa Amador, center executive director.

The name Cleavage Creek isn’t new. Wines were sold under that name by a different owner some years ago, although that campaign, which included marketing copy laced with double entendres, ran into criticism from some. After the name went up for sale – winery labels are routinely bought and sold – Brown’s daughter suggested buying.

“I looked at it and I thought about it for a while,” Brown said. “I liked the name and it fit the property I had in Napa. It just kind of came together.” The new version of Cleavage Creek emphasizes the seven survivors featured on the labels and their stories.

Eventually, Brown hopes to be able to pinpoint “out-of-the-box people in need who are doing something that appears to be successful for a cure. That’s my goal, to try and find a cure somewhere, I may not make it, but it won’t be because I didn’t try.”

By Michelle Locke – www.signonsandiego.com

www.cleavagecreek.com

Tesco rolls out new “retail-ready” wine packaging

Tesco has completed a major packaging review that will see 600 of its wines packed in ‘retail-ready’ packaging by February next year.

05577DEE-7CC8-11DC-9A2D-91EB0B50A946

The retailer plans to roll out the packaging across it entire wine range by the end of 2008.

The leading supermarket worked with six of its wine suppliers – Constellation, Concha Y Toro, Thierry’s, ZGM, Raisin Social and D&D Wines – to make the ‘retail-ready’ packs easier for shop staff to carry and to open.

The outer cases now mirror bottle label designs so staff can find the packs more easily at the back of store and Tesco worked with grocery industry watchdog IGD to come up with a standard set of ‘country of origin’ symbols that can be used across the off-trade.

About 70% of the Tesco wine range, equating to 75% of the volume, will be in the new outer packaging by early next year.

191D060A-7CC8-11DC-864C-C1EB0B50A946

Dan Jago, Tesco category director for beers, wines and spirits, said: “The revised ‘retail-ready’ packaging is more practical and more effective for in-store merchandising and, in the long run, we hope research we have conducted is adopted by other UK retailers.”

by Mike Dennis www.talkingretail.com

Wine Packaging: Room for (Major) Improvement

I’ll get this out of the way right up front – direct to consumer wine packaging is pretty sad. Un-thoughtful. Minimalist (ok, cheap). Underwhelming.

Love-box

Paradoxically, direct is where we producers make our best margins. It’s the place we can most afford to give our best customers a memorable, positive experience. And yet where do all the marketing dollars go? Why, to programming and incentives for corrupt distributors, and toward label and box designs aimed at retail.

As an industry we’ve got it all backwards. Sure, retail is competitive and to stand out you really need to loose the hounds (and the wallet) on the marketplace. But what message are you sending to your direct customers, your “brand ambassadors”, when your $80 pinot arrives unceremoniously in a plain brown box, with nothing other than a receipt inside to show that human thought ever actually entered into the packaging process?

I’ll tell you the message you’re sending.

“Hi there. You’re a high margin customer and we’d like to keep you that way. We might send you some expensive vintage announcement cards to entice you to buy, but once you’ve forked over the cash we’d like to keep it in our pocket, thank you very much. Enjoy the wine Mr. Direct Customer because that’s what you paid for, not a pretty package.”

I think that view is pretty myopic. These direct folks need to be nurtured and cherished. We need to pet them lovingly, and often.

Consider posts like this over at Vinography entitled “When Wine Tastes The Best“. Think back on the last time you had a really great, transcendent glass of wine. Chances are it had less to do with the quality of the wine in the glass than it did with what was going on in your life at the moment. It’s all about experience.

Why then are we sending plain brown boxes to folks forking over luxury prices for a bottle of juice? After all there’s a reason a Tiffany’s box is green (or blue – what heck colors is that!?), and it doesn’t have anything to do with the quality of the silver inside. It’s all about the experience, managing the expectation of what lies within. And it’s an experience that we can help direct with creative packaging.

Sure it will cost more. Sure it will take effort. But aren’t direct customers worth it? And isn’t the payoff worth it? If people are happy, wine just tastes better. That’s good for the customer, good for the brand and good for the bottom line.

By Josh Hermsmeyer.

Starting Out

Most restaurants publicise their menu and their opening hours and then wait for the customers to come pouring through the doors – or not, as the failure of so many ventures of this type proves.

David Vaughan - Proactive push sends Chapel Down to heights

David Vaughan runs a restaurant business with a twist

David Vaughan, who runs the Chapel Down Wine Bar and Bistro, soon realised the value of a more proactive approach to marketing and his venue’s overwhelming popularity is a testament to his strategy’s success.

Vaughan had had a first-rate grounding in the catering industry, working for leading hotel brands like Hilton International and DeVere, and as clubhouse manager at Chart Hills Golf Club, when he first came to Chapel Down Vineyard in Tenterden, Kent, to run a simple tea-house-cum-café above the Vineyard shop.

“I thought it could do a lot better,” he recalls “so I put together a business plan and took a proposal to English Wines, Chapel Down’s owners, which they accepted.” This involved Vaughan running the restaurant on a franchise basis, for which he would pay an up-front franchise fee of £10,000 and an ongoing rental.

Overnight, Vaughan became his own boss, and immediately got stuck into turning his vision into a reality. So what were his priorities? “To bring in a new team, revamp the menus and generally upgrade the whole offering,” he says.

“We got rid of the plastic menu covers and replaced them with blackboards, we changed the name from The Grapevine to Chapel Wine Bar and Bistro, and we moved up market.”

At about the same time, English Wines were embarking on a major refurbishment, investing a considerable amount of money in improving the shop and building a terrace for the restaurant. The two businesses would clearly be symbiotic, each bringing a steady flow of customers to the other.

Vaughan then began building what has become a very significant database, canvassing his customers and asking them what their interests were. From that, it became clear that themed evenings featuring jazz or opera would be very popular and, based on experience he had gained at Chart Hills, Vaughan got in touch with local group, Doctor Jazz.

The idea took a little while to catch on, with only around 30-35 covers at the early events, but now, says Vaughan, customers need to book six months ahead if they want to be sure of getting one of the 70 seats available. The light opera dinners are just as heavily booked, with regular customers reserving places for the entire season.

“Our philosophy is to base it on really good food and make it a fun night, so you tend to see the same faces appearing regularly.

“I used to do around a dozen events a year,” Vaughan continues, “but now I’ve had to cut it back to eight, because there’s another side of the business that has also taken off very successfully and there are simply not enough weekends to go round.”

He is talking about weddings, which have mushroomed in number since they were first introduced last year. A licence was granted for marriages to take place either outside in the Herb Garden or inside in the Bistro, and couples can put their big day together using a variety of different options.

All this is on top of 50-60 covers a day for lunch and regular corporate bookings, when the whole place is taken over for meetings and seminars, frequently in conjunction with English Wines.

Vaughan’s ideas for marketing are endless. He has already introduced special fish weekends, featuring the very best of the local catch, and in the autumn he plans to bring in carvery lunches on Sundays, after 81pc of his customers said they would come if he did.

He regularly takes part in The Daily Telegraph’s lunch promotions, and joins forces with the Vineyard to offer a gift experience, incorporating a wine tour and lunch, sold through Boots and the online gift company, Into the Blue. This is a restaurant business with a twist.

Aspiring restaurateurs take note.

By Jenny Hirschkorn.

The Rich Are Intoxicated By Wine Making

Two hundred new wine cellars have opened up in South Africa over the past two years.

This is particularly surprising, given that there is a global over-supply of wine and the local market has been stagnant for years.

Wine making is seldom a big money-spinner: the market is simply too competitive, here and abroad. But the new entrants include the rich, for whom producing one’s own label is intoxicating enough without having to make any money from it, at least in the short term.

A new report on the liquor industry by Who Owns Whom shows that there has been surprisingly little consolidation in the wine industry. It is still dominated by small and medium players.

These estates are mostly situated in the Stellenbosch/Paarl area of the Western Cape, which is increasingly being given over to so-called “boutique estates”.

Bigger scale vineyards are moving out to areas like Robertson, Worcester and the Northern Cape where land and labour are cheaper and growing conditions just as good.

South African producers are increasingly recognising the importance of guaranteed markets. Supermarkets now buy directly from some estates — such as Simonsvlei, one of the bigger players with a 7% market share — although competitive shelf prices mean slim margins for producers.

South Africans drink, on average, nine litres of wine a year, a paltry amount compared to the citizens of Luxembourg, who down 66 litres a year each. Or the French who drink 48.5 litres.

The obvious area for expansion is among the black diamond classes, and marketing should be focused there. The indications are that black women prefer white wines, but reject so-called “critter” labels — those with animals or with African names. Their preference appears to be for mainstream, premium wines.

In general, South Africans prefer white wine. Red wine accounts for less than 15% of local consumption.

But it is in the export market that South Africans are likely to make the biggest gains.

Currently, we are the world’s eighth-biggest producer with just more than 3% of the global market.

The best bet for the SA wine industry is to go for niche markets — high quality, high-priced wines. The other possibility is to aim for environmentally and socially aware markets .

The global thirst appears to be for New World labels, which South Africa fits into nicely with its cultural diversity and the promise of reinvention as epitomised by the democratisation of 1994.

Spirits have also shown some movement.

The Distell Group, of which SABMiller and KWV each own 30%, now consumes 10% of the total alcoholic beverage spend in South Africa.

International wine and spirits conglomerate Pernod Ricard, which is listed in France but established an office here in 1994, controls key brands such as Jameson and Chivas Regal. Another player is The Really Great Brand Company, which controls Brown Forman beverages such as Southern Comfort.

Diageo, Heineken and Namibia Breweries have a joint venture company in South Africa called brandhouse which recently took the Amstel franchise from SABMiller.

By Andrew Mcgregor (MD of Who Owns Whom).

Source: www.thetimes.co.za

Wine Made the Co-op Way

Michael Mondavi is back in the wine business — with a twist.

Three and a half years after being ousted from his job running the Robert Mondavi Corporation, the famed winery founded by his father, Mr. Mondavi is sharing a small new winery with start-up vintners in a venture he calls a winemakers’ studio.

Mr. Mondavi, 64, certainly does not need the rent. His share of the nearly $1.36 billion from the subsequent sale of Robert Mondavi to Constellation Brands amounted to more than $100 million.

But he says the studio concept broadens the scope of his business, increasing its power with suppliers and distributors, while providing entrepreneurial winemakers an entry into the market without requiring significant capital outlays.

“To compete with the big guys, the small family-owned wineries need to be both independent and interdependent,” Mr. Mondavi said. “Own your own vineyard, maintain your personality and style, but be interdependent on everything else, like buying glass and negotiating with distributors.”

It’s a new model for new-age vintners. California’s reputation for quality wine originated with entrepreneurs and immigrant families who borrowed from banks to buy land and relied on their own sweat equity while waiting for their vines and their wine to mature.

But few take that path today.

Aside from some superboutiques offering wines at $100 a bottle and up, most of the wine made here these days is produced and distributed by multinational beverage giants or spirits manufacturers. Today’s wine start-ups are often “virtual” wineries, little more than a brand name and a label on a bottle, supplied by one of the state’s “custom crush” operations, which make wine to specification for numerous clients. These can lead to good wines, even great ones, but the individual nose-in-the-barrel element is missing.

Not only are the start-up costs of a bricks-and-mortar winery prohibitive for many small operators, but getting the finished product onto store shelves is an even bigger challenge.

“Big distributors have hundreds or thousands of brands, and each has a number of 800-pound gorillas,” Mr. Mondavi said. “These 800-pound gorillas tell them what to do. I know because I was one.”

Indeed. Robert Mondavi shipped over 10 million cases in 2004. By contrast, Folio Fine Wine Partners, as Mr. Mondavi’s new venture is called, plans to stay below 50,000 cases from its own production here.

That will be spread among five brands owned by members and friends of the Mondavi family: Hangtime, I’M, Medusa, Oberon and Spellbound.

Mr. Mondavi and his wife, Isabel, own 10 percent of the business. Their son Rob, 36, president for winegrowing, owns 39 percent; so does their daughter, Dina, 31, the creative director. The company’s employees own the small remaining share.

To give greater heft to its business, Folio imports wine from Italy produced by the Frescobaldi family, as well as wines from Spain, Austria, New Zealand and Argentina. Altogether, Folio sold about 300,000 cases last year.

“Our import portfolio is $40 million-plus in sales, so I can get the attention of the distributors to the point where I can at least present Oberon or I’M,” Mr. Mondavi said. “I was convinced that if we just did our own 100 acres and 40,000 cases, we could never get enough clout in the market.”

Riding piggyback on Folio’s overall business are several much smaller winemakers. For these winemakers, the studio offers access to a level of equipment they could never begin to afford, representation at Folio’s tasting room, and a chance to place their wines with restaurants and retailers they could not reach independently.

“When Folio was starting up, I saw the people they were bringing on for sales, and I knew them from Mondavi,” said Tina Cox, who, with her husband, Mike, is producing 800 cases of pinot noir at Folio under the Mayro-Murdick brand. “They had the relationships with the wholesalers and retailers, and they really loved the wine.”

A passion for the product is a requirement for entry in the Folio studio, Mr. Mondavi said. “We will not custom-make wines like the custom-crush operations. We will only work with winemakers who will be hands-on. We want them here seven days a week during the harvest.”

The studio concept, Mr. Mondavi said, began with the Carlton Winemakers Studio, in Carlton, Ore., which opened in 2002. Rob Mondavi produced a pinot noir there before Folio acquired its own winery.

Carlton was the brainchild of Eric Hamacher, a self-described “winemaking gypsy,” who had made wine in a series of borrowed winery spaces across California and Oregon, along with his wife Luisa Ponzi, and their partners, Ned and Kirsten Lumpkin.

Mr. Lumpkin, a successful contractor, owned a vineyard but needed a winemaker. Together, Mr. Lumpkin and Mr. Hamacher built an environmentally benign winery tailored to the needs of small producers.

“The whole idea of a shared winemaking facility is you don’t need to be that fifth-generation winemaker that already has everything paid off,” Mr. Hamacher said. “You’re not locking up all of your capital waiting for your first vintage to arrive.”

The Carlton studio has the capacity to produce 18,000 cases of wine, which is currently shared by 10 winemakers, including Mr. Hamacher.

Each is individually licensed, and they operate under an alternating proprietorship that allows them to label their wines as “produced and bottled by,” which connotes an independent winery, as opposed to “cellared and bottled by,” which indicates that the wine was produced in a facility owned by another entity.

This licensing arrangement also allows each owner’s wines to be poured in the studio’s tasting room, and for direct sales to customers in states, like New York, that restrict such shipments.

“We’re all independent wineries working under an alternating proprietorship, and that’s what differentiates us from custom crush,” said Andrew Rich, who produced 7,500 cases last year, making him the largest winemaker at Carlton. “Custom crush is, ‘Here are my grapes, call me when it’s in the bottle.’ We’re all doing what we’re doing by ourselves.”

To be fair, established custom-crush operators work closely with their client winemakers, who are often intimately involved in the various steps from grapes to wine.

And some of California’s most sought-after “cult” wines have been produced at these facilities, including Pahlmeyer, Marcassin and Bryant Family, all of which were crushed, blended or aged at the Napa Wine Company, a big custom-crush operation just down the road from the Robert Mondavi Winery in Oakville.

Indeed, custom crush often serves as a launching pad for new vintners while they establish a brand and raise capital for a brick and mortar winery.

Last year, there were 1,587 virtual wineries in the United States, according to Wine Business Monthly, an industry magazine. That’s down 171 from 2005.

But few of those have actually disappeared: 153 of those no longer considered virtual wineries are now counted among the nation’s bonded wineries. Winemaker studios provide a way to acquire bonded status without the capital outlay of building a winery and buying equipment.

“The trend in the wine industry clearly is to tie up less capital,” said Cyril Penn, Wine Business Monthly’s editor in chief. “There are quite a few of these kind of cooperative ventures sprouting up that are different spins on it.”

Another new model is Les Garagistes, a winemakers’ “village” that plans to break ground next spring in American Canyon, a formerly neglected area between Napa and Vallejo.

Les Garagistes will offer 12 winemaking spaces about 4,500 square feet in size, which can be leased by individual winemakers or groups. Capital equipment, like crusher/stemmers and wine presses, will be shared, and the wineries will surround a central courtyard with a café and a tasting room.

“For somebody who’s making 500 cases of wine, owning a winery doesn’t make sense,” said John Hawkins, a partner in Les Garagistes.

“The very small people have to go to a custom-crush facility,” he said, “but once you get a little larger, our option is very attractive, because custom crush is not cheap. This is a needs-based concept.”

By Lawrence Fisher.

Wine Labels That Make A Splash

ht_norma_jeane_070910_ssv

More and more vineyards these days are counting on bright, funky, in-your-face labels to sell wine. The hope is that in a crowded marketplace consumers will pick out these wines, fall in love with them and become repeat buyers. Here’s a look at one of these bold labels.

Marilyn Wines, part of Nova Wines Inc. of St. Helena, Calif., holds an exclusive agreement with the estate of Marilyn Monroe for the use of the name and the images. Here is its Norma Jeane A Young Merlot. (Nova Wines)

Source: www.abcnews.go.com

Martha Stewart Makes Wine (not!)

Do Martha’s wines lack authenticity?

There has been an announcement in the wine world that Martha Stewart has entered into an agreement with E&J Gallo to bottle wine for her under the label “Martha Stewart Vintage.”  Check out these stories about this news:  Tom Wark’s Fermentation and the San Francisco Chronicle.

6a00cd971dad4d4cd500d09e7b831dbe2b-500pi

I am fascinated by this collaboration.  This kind of practice in the wine world is nothing new — wine makers make wine for other people’s labels all the time.  The good folks at Trader Joe’s are making a mint off the enormous volume of sales of it’s Charles Shaw wines (aka “Two Buck Chuck”) — wine that is made by the Bronco Wine Company.  The Charles Shaw wines purport to be from Napa (check out the label sometime), but the grapes are actually grown in the much-less-desirable Central Valley of California.  Think Bakersfield.  And the bottle says “Charles Shaw,” not Bronco Wines.  And it would be misleading to assume this only affects “low end” wine and wineries.  Even the biggest name wineries engage in this lucrative practice.  It happens throughout the wine world.

The Martha Stewart announcement provides a helpful lens, though, for some reflection on this practice and its implications beyond the world of wine.  This is rich ground for musing — I love this!  Wine as a commodity.  Wine as a product.  Wine as a pawn in the world of commerce.  The art of winemaking reduced to signatures on a contract.  I can see a new reality TV show in the making… Martha Stewart Vineyard versus Two Buck Chuck.  I’d watch just to see the divas actually drink what’s in the bottles that bear their names!

But there is more to this story than just the raw commerce of it all. There is something about character and the character of wine. The wines labeled “Martha Stewart Vineyard” will NOT be from Martha’s Vineyard (so to speak). The illusion is that they will bear the sophistication of the cashmere sweater and pressed linen napkins of a Martha Stewart afternoon tea. But there is no authenticity. It is a fraud. It lacks integrity. It’s plagiarism — the signature on the artist’s canvas had nothing to do with the creation of the art (even if the art, as in this case, is like mass-produced “Velvet Elvis” prints that can be purchased at any flea market). But it’s intentional — Martha (rather, the Martha Industry) will want her consumers to assume the wine is of her own making.

Perhaps the charitable thing to do would be to wish Martha well, and to join in a chorus of “cheers!” with those who will drink her (er, I mean Gallo’s) wine. But then I myself would be inauthentic.

By WineMinistry.

Good advice on marketing to women

Andrea Learned, author and consultant, advises marketers and media on how to effectively reach women and men beyond typical gender advertising stereotypes. Learned, 43, has spent 17 years in marketing and public relations for trade associations and in 2004 she co-authored Don’t Think Pink: What Really Makes Women Buy. Her blog and columns in the Huffington Post take a careful look at online and offline marketing that attracts female consumers.

She tells Adweek’s Joan Voight why big beer brands are finally getting smart, discusses the power of bloggers and explains why she hopes the notion of marketing to women is doomed. I know Its about beer.. but the interview goes beyond that. 

26_reg_AndreaLearned_L

Do you think some large brands are shooting themselves in the foot in the way they treat women in their marketing?

In the effort to appeal to young men, brands such as Coors and Bud still go for stereotypes of frat boys and hot babes, which tends to alienate women over 25 as well as many men. The ads look moronic to anyone but the target market. Another problem is financial institutions and other industries that use marketing programs overtly aimed at women. It sends the message that women are not part of the mainstream and need special attention. Both of these strategies are too specific and don’t have the kind of universal appeal that will build the brand.

Speaking of big beer brands aimed at men, do you see any changes in their approach to gender stereotypes?

I do. For instance, Miller’s “Man Laws” ads with Burt Reynolds targeted guys, but anyone could relate to them. And the recent Miller Lite ads showing the frat boys chanting “drink” also show a woman handing a beer to a man who makes it clear he is not with the chanting group. This approach still talks to men but pokes fun at the old ways that beer used to be sold.

Does the influence of digital media such as blogs and social networks help or hinder the use of gender stereotypes in marketing?

Brands can’t hide from bloggers. If a company wants to use negative stereotypes to win favor with a target audience, it is not like it can put its ads on a targeted TV program or Web site and only the target is going to hear about it. All it takes is one person outside the target group to see it and be motivated to comment about it online and the word gets around. When it comes to ads that are negative to women, new moms seem particularly dialed into the stereotypes and if they blog they can get their peers up in arms. You can quickly have a groundswell of outrage and generate bad press online that anyone can find. For instance, blogs told women that Unilever, the company that did the Dove “Real Beauty” campaign [showing real-life woman in their underwear], is the same company behind the ads for Axe body spray, which treat young women like sex objects. Blogging is really scary for brands. They have to learn how to speak to their target without freaking out everyone else.

Are women really going to go to all that trouble to attack a brand?

My experience shows that women are taking advantage of the fact that many marketers are now noticing them and asking for their feedback, so they are complaining about things and naming names. Take the 2006 Volkswagen GTI TV ad campaign with the devilish “Fast” character [in which nagging girlfriends interfere with young men who want to drive fast]. Word got out and it generated a lot of negative buzz. The online disapproval of Dove’s connection to the Axe approach is still going on.

Can products with a core audience of men use women consumers as allies to grow the business?

Let’s go back to beer. A brand goes after its main male audience, but often to get more women to buy its brand it creates a sweet girly beverage, such as Heineken’s new cider beverage. Instead, the main beer brand should seek to convince the 30 percent of females who really like beer to switch to their brand. An overtly girly marketing approach just alienates those women. It is better to include them in the mainstream ads. The approach worked with Nascar. The sport’s marketing included women whose husband or boyfriend were fans. Those women became fans and then told their women friends what they liked about Nascar.

What do you consider “girly” marketing?

Anything that’s pink, that assumes all women are devoted to shopping, dieting or having their nails done.

Does this work both ways? Are some products with girly marketing excluding male consumers?

Certainly. Skin care and hair care are my best examples of that. Diet programs are another example. Publishers often assume that all dieters are women. Here’s a situation that makes me laugh. This man Jay Jacobs loved this book The Beck Diet Solution, but the cover was bright pink to appeal to women. So on his computer he designed a blue version of the cover, which he used when he was reading the book in public, and he put the blue cover on his Web site for other male readers of the book to download and use. Now the publisher is offering the book with a blue or pink cover. The Method brand of soaps and cleaning products gets around this problem and has done very well with both sexes. The product design is elegant and sophisticated without being stereotypically male or female.

Why do marketers seem so interested in gender-specific products and marketing?

Because it is sexy, it’s easy and it’s familiar. Out of the gate, they identify their market by gender. It reminds me of a survey on shopping that said men are not efficient shoppers. Actually the survey showed that infrequent shoppers are not efficient, whether they are men or women. Many of the men in the survey did not shop frequently.

If marketers don’t categorize markets by gender, what other characteristics can they use?

That question came up in a recent study about wine by Mondavi and Harris Interactive. The study, released Sept. 18, seemed to indicate that younger people and women are less likely to order wine in restaurants. But the company wisely said the real issue was that some consumers were less knowledgeable about wine and less confident in ordering it. So instead of marketing to men, the winery plans to improve the educational aspects of its marketing.

How can listening to women help mainstream marketers overall?

Women’s standards in purchasing are higher than men’s. So if a company can satisfy women’s requirements, they will also serve their male customers. Lowe’s and Home Depot improved their aisles and shelves for women but also improved the customer experience for men. The big stereotype is that women are so time starved, but men are busy too and will respond to that message.

Are there closet female brands, brands that have a strong appeal to women customers but don’t identify themselves as being for women or use girly marketing?

ING Financial strikes me as a closet women-focused brand. Plain, simple, with lots of education if you need it. Also, really nice customer-service people. I’d also say Saturn, the Volkswagen Beetle and the Life Is Good line of apparel.

What are your top three tips for companies about including women in their marketing?

First, use storytelling and anecdotes in your messaging. The American Express TV and print ads with Larry David, Ellen DeGeneres and others do a great job of this. Second, provide tools and services to answer consumers’ questions and increase their comfort level with your products. Your Web site can be a good place for this. Third, form a customer advisory board that includes women members, even if your core audience is men. Get female consumers involved.

Overall, it sounds like you think the idea of marketing to women should become an obsolete concept. Are you talking yourself out of a job?

Yes, I could be. But I think it is the way of the world. We are in a conceptual age where men are more comfortable with emotional issues—and the right side of the brain and left side of the brain are working together. Maybe we can get out of this ridiculous gender business.